With the launch of Chetan Bhagat’s latest book, Half
Girlfriend, the literary fault lines in the country were never as clear as they
are now. It has yet again, stroked the
debate on what is good writing and what is just crass and ultimately destined
for a biblio-blackhole. At one end of the divide are the hard-nosed elites, who
are full of contempt and derision for anything that closely resembles the much
popular, Bhagat genre of writing and at the other is what one may call the new
Indian reader, who considers Bhagat’s novels to be the apotheosis of writing.
If one can be accused of possessing a simple, lucid and
a chatty style of writing, then Bhagat can definitely be pursued for felony. However,
there are other authors who have written books that use a simple style and
language and yet are never an object of such ridicule as Bhagat is. A glowing
example is Paolo Coelho, he has perhaps sold more books than Bhagat and yet he
is never at the receiving end of literary snobs’ pungent pugnacity.
So, if it’s not about the writing or the content of the
book, then is this about politics of protecting literary fiefdoms?
India has become the third largest English language
books market in the world after the US and UK. However the per capita
expenditure on books is only at around Rs. 80 per annum [1]. Books
like Half Girlfriend are generally priced in the range of Rs 100-200 which
makes them a value proposition for the readers who have English as their second
or third language, and this market is particularly large in India. According to
data put out by Rupa Publications[2] there is an altogether new
market for books that the Bhagat phenomena has unleashed, this is typically the
reader who buys 2-4 books per year, and prefers a simple, lucid and chatty
style of writing. These readers are instrumental in pushing book sales to the unprecedented
million copies mark.
As more and more people get hooked to English language
books, the traditional, elite Indian reader has positioned himself as the
guardian knight of what he perceives as true literature; largely inaccessible work
characterized by its recondite prose, and in the process denigrating Bhagat
genre of writing.
Consider your friend circle, undoubtedly, you will find
a pseudo critic who is unsparing in his tirade against Chetan Bhagat or a
Ravinder Singh books. These are typically the people who read anything over a
50-100 books per year, and in an attempt to differentiate their literary tastes
they ridicule and disparage the literary wisdom of those who prefer the more
simpler, and often somewhat interesting, forms of writing, like that of Bhagat.
This human need to differentiate oneself from the crowd is the root of the
literary polarization that we witness in society today. Nevertheless, India
doesn’t seem to mind the snobs, Half Girlfriend is all set to break new records
in just a few days.
[1] Publishing
Market Profile Report – India, Global Publishing Information, United Kingdom,
2008
[2] The Age of Bhagat, Cover Story, India Today magazine, September
8,2014 issue
Related
post:
“Let
us not denounce challenging writing as a masquerade for literary elitism…”
This is a related piece I wrote on language and
elitism and can be found here http://nastyeyedmonk.blogspot.in/2014/06/elitism-and-pile-of-literary-stuff.html
Well written. However, i must disagree on a few points.
ReplyDeleteChetan Bhagat, although i have no personal enmity with him, has begun the process of the destruction of Indian Literature. Books are meant to be probed and delved into, but his books offer no room for that. It is simply blatant, in your face masala, and oomph.
What this has led to is a creation of an insufferable group of people who call themselves 'well read' when all they've done is glance through the glorified sexual exploits of a frustrated guy who has no literary prowess whatsoever.
Instead of banning good books citing stupid communal reasons, we should ban bad literature.
If India, a country with a youth majority, is treated to this trash, then our country's future will be lost.
There are many tagore's out there, we just don't promote their literature.
Cheers.
At the very onset, thankyou for sharing your views. Every individual has his/her own understanding of what literature should be, as you rightly have yours. However, our own definition of what qualifies as good literature should not call into question, and at worse ridicule the choices that others make. And if we are to make sure that India gets its fare share of content becoming of literature, then we must produce such content in styles that are accessible to the masses, and leave it for them to decide what they want to read.
DeleteCheers
Agree totally.
ReplyDelete